M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
« Aug | Oct » | |||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
- 28/12/2011: What is mind?
- 25/12/2011: Possible functions of consciousness 9 - marking agency
- 22/12/2011: Short-term memory capacity
- 19/12/2011: Possible functions of consciousness 8 - broadcasting waves
- 17/12/2011: half million total visitor mark passed on Dec 16
- 16/12/2011: Fusiform Face Area again
- 13/12/2011: Background links
- 10/12/2011: Possible functions of consciousness 7 - attention on the significant
- 08/12/2011: All that jazz
- 04/12/2011: the face of the sky
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
Here we go again
Sometime soon I will have to stop rising to what is said about free will. I started this posting in response to K. Smith’s article (see citation below) because the article seemed a way to confuse rather than to clarify. I almost finished when I read the sensible blog by Bjoern Brembs (here) with which I largely agree. It did not cover all my problems with Smith’s article but enough make me simply change course. I confined myself to one interesting passage rather than the rest of the badly done article.
Haynes’s research and its possible implications have certainly had an effect on how he thinks. He remembers being on a plane on his way to a conference and having an epiphany. “Suddenly I had this big vision about the whole deterministic universe, myself, my place in it and all these different points where we believe we’re making decisions just reflecting some causal flow.” But he couldn’t maintain this image of a world without free will for long. “As soon as you start interpreting people’s behaviours in your day-to-day life, it’s virtually impossible to keep hold of,” he says.
The Haynes quote is interesting. I have had such moments of clarity from time to time where I am part of a ‘causal flow’ (although I would describe myself and my surroundings as physical reality rather than deterministic universe). I would be very surprised if this was a rare image although it is probably not common either.
Here is an aside - as regular readers of my blog will know, I disagree with determinism as much as I disagree with free will. Here is a condensed version for those who have not encountered previous blogs on this subject on my site. Both free will and determinism are flawed, outdated ideas. I think that we make decisions using only material brains and physical processes but the decisions are not very predictable and we are usually responsible for them. Causal does not necessarily mean predictable. I do not think that consciousness has much to do with decision making or any other cognitive process. But whether decisions can or cannot contain some conscious processes along with unconscious ones, either way, it does not affect our ownership of our decisions. I am more interested in my decisions being appropriate than free and I am more interested in how decision are made than in arguments about free will and determinism. This way of looking at things is partially due to a similar image to the one Haynes reports.
Beside the Haynes like image, there is an image that I have much, much more often and that I find very comforting. I seem to be very whole and full of rhythms of heart beat, breathing, walking, blinking – not distinct but intermingled. I seem in real contact with the world around me, with the thinnest of boundaries, almost nothing separates me from the rest of reality. On top of this feeling is something like a flickering movie screen – a thin insubstantial stream of consciousness. It is very comforting to feel that I am more real and more substantially than that movie. I feel part of reality rather than free of it and I do not feel like part of a clock-work type of reality but something far more complex. The image is gone when I try to actually live in the world – get things done, communicate in words and so on. The movie becomes the me-in-the-world. Now I’m in consciousness again, but also with a renewal of a deep trust and identification with the unconscious part.
Of course such images are not very well expressed in words, but words is what we have - sorry. We also have science, so we do not have to rely on vague feelings, but can work for a more accurate understanding.
Smith, K. (2011). Neuroscience vs philosophy: Taking aim at free will Nature, 477 (7362), 23-25 DOI: 10.1038/477023a
19/09/2011 at 07:59 pm
It’s great to get to that point and to be more aware of how we think and are. When I get to this point it feels really peaceful and its great to really experience the moment. I also feel like “hanging in there” wrapped by the whole world. Hehe.
I’m glad that science really diggs into this topic in the last couple of years. I’m sure there will be some exciting findings in the next years!
19/09/2011 at 09:42 pm
Haynes’ argument is a logical fallacy: the ad baculum
JK: I do not see his description as an argument, just a description of an image that affected his thinking. The is no ad baculum as there is no argument and no force or threat of force. Also we are not dealing primarily with a logic argument but with a question that will be settled (some day) with experimental evidence.
24/10/2011 at 09:30 am
Please check out the links below. You might find it interesting. What you are stating as your experience seems to be a quick peek /glimpse into the experience that is supposedly “enlightenment” in many religions (or recognition of our true nature as pure awareness). When you get deeper into the experience a lot more clarity and joy is bound to follow:-)
http://www.realization.org/page/topics/self_inquiry.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YohNZUqpcxU
28/10/2011 at 01:17 am
Dear fellow blogger,
Let me invite you and your readers to participate in an upcoming series of Q&A sessions on Brain Fitness with three authors featured in AARP’s recently released list of Best Books on Brain Fitness. The SharpBrains blog team was honored to have published one of those best books so we are excited to present this series and enable several good conversations on this very timely and controversial topic. Participants will submit written questions, moderators will select the most important and relevant questions, and book authors will write their answers for everyone to read.
UCLA neuroscientist Gary Small will kickstart the series next Tuesday:
* November 1st, 2011, 2-3pm Eastern Time: Dr. Gary Small, author of The Memory Bible
* November 15th, 2011, 2-3pm Eastern Time: Alvaro Fernandez, co-author of The SharpBrains Guide to Brain Fitness
* November 22nd, 2011, 2-3pm Eastern Time: Dr. Paul Nussbaum, author of Save Your Brain
You and your readers can learn more and join us at:
http://www.sharpbrains.com/brain-fitness-conversations-live-qa/
Hope you enjoy it,
Luis M Novo @
Sharpbrains blog