You are currently browsing the thoughts on thoughts weblog archives for May, 2010.
M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
« Apr | Jun » | |||||
1 | 2 | |||||
3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
31 |
- 25/12/2011: Possible functions of consciousness 9 - marking agency
- 22/12/2011: Short-term memory capacity
- 19/12/2011: Possible functions of consciousness 8 - broadcasting waves
- 17/12/2011: half million total visitor mark passed on Dec 16
- 16/12/2011: Fusiform Face Area again
- 13/12/2011: Background links
- 10/12/2011: Possible functions of consciousness 7 - attention on the significant
- 08/12/2011: All that jazz
- 04/12/2011: the face of the sky
- 01/12/2011: Possible functions of consciousness 6 - presence 'here'
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
Archive for May 2010
Past, present and future
30/05/2010 by admin.
The blog Neurophilosophy has a review of the connection between space and time, and between direction and past or future. (here) It is worth reading in full as I am only talking about a very little part of the review.
We know that imagining a future event is dependent on memory, because patients with amnesia cannot imagine new experiences. It involves piecing together fragments of past experiences to generate a plausible simulation of what might happen.
It seems that memory and imagination/planning use the same basic mental processes. There is the same framework for consciousness of now, of memories and of ‘what if’ scenes. Consciousness is used to create memory, memory is used to produce future imaginings and short term projections are use to produce the consciousness of now. Only what is found in consciousness is stored in episodic memory. We know that stimulations of the future and imaginings are constructed from memory scrapes. And our conscious experience is a slight prediction. The difference between our current consciousness and recalled memories or imaginings seems to be in the amount of detail and the vividness of the experience. I presume that both the detail and the vividness is due to the availability of the actual sensory data in the sensory cortex areas that is only there for a few moments.
Posted in memory | 1 Comment »
Important noise
27/05/2010 by admin.
ScienceDaily reports (here) on the work of B. He and group on the noise that is discarded from EEGs when the dominant waves such as gamma, theta etc. are recorded. They feel it must contain valuable information.
“These temporal connections reach outside of the domains of periodic brain waves that neuroscientists study and into the irregular, arrhythmic brain activity that we discard,” she explains. “This (research) suggests that there are patterns of temporal organization in those irregular signals. Those patterns may reflect important aspects of brain architecture and function.”…
“The noisy activity of the brain at rest and in the background when we perform tasks actually represents the majority of what the brain is really doing” Raichle says. “We know this to be the case when we measure the cost of running the brain and find that this background activity accounts for most of it. Biyu’s (He) pioneering research is a major step forward in helping us understand how this background activity is organized.”
Analysis of this noise shows that it has a pattern that is common in natural systems. Signals produce a regular pattern: a diagonal line on the results graph that goes from the upper left (high-power, low-frequency brain waves) to the lower right (low-power, high-frequency brain waves). This power spectrum changes with various activities of the brain, a source of potential information that has not been used to date.
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »
Summary May 24 2010
24/05/2010 by admin.
This blog has reached its second birthday and it is time for a little summary. I have made a list of general ideas/questions that I am trying to investigate, and then, for each heading, I list the posts that apply to that idea.
Purpose of the blog
The aim of this blog is to prepare people for the revolution that is going to happen now in neuroscience. The very first post (1 Jun 08 aims ) outlined the scope of the blog. The aims are enlarged on later in (10 Aug 08 scientific shocks). To give an indication of the type of material that was intended in the blog an early post gave a list (12 Jun 08 what do we know about consciousness) and another gave probable functions (2 Jul 08 does consciousness have a function). Putting consciousness in context was the purpose of (9 Oct 08 one way to look at consciousness).
A different way to look at consciousness
Some posts have been specifically written to help people come to grips with a different way of viewing their mental life. These posts hardly contain any quotes or links to scientific material. I have used some descriptions of my own way of seeing myself: (6 Jun 08 living without a conscious mind) (10 Jul 08 decisions) (15 Aug 08 who is watching) (18 Oct 08 why make problems) (15 Nov 08 metaphors for consciousness) (30 Nov 08 metaphor) (15 Dec 08 a few definitions) (18 Mar 09 Little thought experiment) (22 Feb 09 A framework) (23 Apr 09 History of the quest) (29 Sep 2009 mind maintenance) (11 Feb 10 definitions of consciousness) (21 Apr 10 mind maintenance 2)
Some posts look at more specific problems in understanding consciousness
-
The question of how qualia (the qualities of our experience) are produced has been a problem, especially for philosophers. (13 Jun 08 why not) (21 Sep 08 the wrong questions) (5 Jan 09 Experiencing someone else’s qualia) It is not yet clear how the binding of qualia to objects or concepts is done. (26 May 09 the location of objects) (22 Jun 09 inexpressible experience) (05 Oct 09 colour binding) (15 Jan 10 a comment) (8 Feb 10 the purpose of colour) (22 Mar 10 perception does not depend on sensation)
-
Consciousness includes awareness of fringe events. (25 Oct 08 a certain feeling) (12 Nov 08 fringe consciousness) (3 Dec 08 confidence) (24 Jan 09 Feeling a presence) Embodiment may be key to fringe qualia. (11 May 09 movement as the foundation) (23 May 09 two way arrow) (29 May 09 embodiment) (23 Sep 09 a pain metaphor) ( 7 Nov 09 the body loop) (10 Dec 09 metaphor 2) (12 Apr 10 feeling a presence) (6 May 10 control of emotion) (9 May 10 emotional feeling) (12 May 10 method acting) (15 May 10 embodied power)
-
There is also a problem of what to do about free will. The mechanics of intention, producing a movement command, and moving is complex, not at all is it feels consciously (26 Jul 08 the interpreter) (17 Sep 08 the problem of free will) (15 Oct 08 a feeling of will) (31 Oct 08 virtual agency) (3 Nov 08 Llinas) (6 Nov 08 more Llinas) (18 Nov 08 decisions without frontal lobe activity) (14 Jan 09 The moment of decision 1) (17 Jan 09 The moment of decision 2) (14 May 09 an odd result)(20 May 09 not so odd result) (17 Oct 09 some clarity on rewards) (30 Jan 10 prediction as intent) (5 Feb 10 an old argument) (9 Apr 10 today’s vitalism) (15 Apr 10 are there mirror neurons in humans) (24 Apr 10 No-go control)
-
A spatial construction is basic to consciousness, used for location and other maps. (19 Aug 08 the 3D world) (30 Sep 08 built-in sat-nav) (2 Jan 09 Border cells) (25 Jul 09 time and space) (21 Aug 09 3D revisited) (24 Aug 09 which way is north?) (26 Oct 09 the maps in our minds)
-
There is one is probably one mechanism for various types of awareness. And there are various states akin to consciousness (4 Sep 08 shared workspace) (8 Sep 08 what goes on in dreams) (3 Oct 08 consciousness in Zen meditation) (21 Nov 08 default network) (9 Dec 08 hypnosis) (2 May 09 baby mind)(17 May 09 the realness of virtual reality) (28 Jul 09 locked in consciousness) (20 Oct 09 near death EEG spikes) (7 Dec 09 reborn) (14 Feb 10 default network gone in coma) (16 Mar 10 what happens in meditation) (31 Mar 10 altered states – alcohol) 18 Apr 10 the usefulness of dreams) Thinking can be different when it does not have to be tied to awareness of the thinking. (27 Sep 08 eureka). Possibly imagination can be different from experience (1 Feb 09 Visual imagery).
-
An important question is how we live in the present when it takes time for the brain to process information and render it part of consciousness. (24 Jun 08 living in the present) Changizi explains some visual illusions by projection into future (26 Aug 08 living in the present 2) It affects tennis refs (9 Nov 08 prediction). Not only does it take time to produce conscious experience, the process is like frames of a movie, so it is discontinuous rather than being continuous. (19 Jul 08 watching the movie) (27 Aug 09 clock speeds). Also (26 Jan 09 Surprise) (6 Mar 09 Up the garden path) (29 Oct 09 sense of time) (13 Mar 10 blinking together). Summarized in (6 Aug 09 Property of consciousness 1)
-
What is the relationship between consciousness and our sense of self? Does a theory-of-mind apply to us as well as others. (22 Oct 08 the homunculus problem) (8 Jan 09 Self is not simple) (9 Mar 09 Meta-representation) (08 Apr 09 Conscious computer) (28 Jun 09 unwilling to see yourself) (13 Jul 09 the guessing trick) (22 Jul 09 Eco cells) (18 Aug 09 Out of body experience) (8 Sep 09 two selves) (26 Sep 09 what are mirror neurons doing) (10 Nov 09 out of body 2) (13 Nov 09 Avatars) (28 Dec 09 I and me) (3 Mar 10 no voters) (6 Apr 10 going native) (21 May 10 mirror neurons in autism)
-
Personally I suspect a close relationship between consciousness and memory. (4 Feb 09 Towards understanding working memory) (7 Feb 09 Memory) (10 Feb 09 Memories in time) (13 Feb 08 Implicit and explicit memory) (15 Mar 09 Keeping echoes in mind) (11 Apr 09 Visual memory) (8 May 09 limitations of working memory) (4 Dec 09 working memory) (16 Dec 09 holding something in mind) (24 Jan 10 a bit of working memory) (10 Mar 10 phases to separate memories) (29 Mar 10 several ways of remembering) Summarized in (12 Aug 2009 property of consciousness 3)
-
The focus of attention is related to consciousness. (14 Apr 09 Attention 1) (17 Apr 09 Attention 2) (16 Jun 09 attention brain waves) (17 Sep 09 awareness of the internal) (20 Sep 09 controller of alert status) (3 Apr 10 controlling attention) (30 Apr 10 the delete key) (3 May 10 Mind wandering) Summarized in (16 Aug 09 Property of consciousness 4)
Old ideas that get in the way
There are ways of thinking that interfere with understanding the brain. (12 Dec 08 a different angle) (25 Dec 09 folk knowledge)
-
Some people take the metaphor between computers and brains a little too seriously. (19 Jun 08 brain-computer metaphor)
-
Many people are resistance to there being a continuity between our brains and those of other animals. (4 Aug 08 are animals conscious?) (23 Aug 08 a birds eye view) (28 Oct 08 dogs) (24 Nov 08 Occams razor and rules of thumb) (12 Dec 08 hangover from the Great Chain of Beings) (27 Dec 08 not just a few animals) (19 Jun 09 anthropomorphism) (16 Jul 09 walking like a duck) (28 Nov 09 Size is not everything) (20 Feb 10 baggage2-Skinner)
-
I have encountered a strict identification of language with consciousness that I think is counterproductive. (7 Aug 08 the inner voice) (24 Sep 08 unconscious meaning).
-
A leftover from Freudian theories is a distrust of unconscious thinking. (6 Oct 08 bad press for unconscious) (18 Feb 10 baggage1-Freud)
-
The idea that the neo-cortex is the only part of the brain involved in producing consciousness is counter production. The thalamus as well as the cortex is important in producing consciousness (11 Sep 08 Grand Central Station) (21 Dec 08 thalamus waves) (13 Dec 09 include the thalamus) (6 Jan 10 brain stem involvement in attention) (12 Jan 10 the cortex is not the hub) (7 Mar 10 turning off consciousness)
-
There may be some resistance from philosophers to scientists look at an area that has until now been only examined by them. Thankfully, not a;; philosophers. (29 Jan 09 New philosophical research project) (30 Mar 09 Reductionism is necessary) (05 Apr 09 Biology and culture) (14 Sep 09 criticizing a critic of Pinker) (16 Nov 09 science and philosophy) (23 Feb 10 Baggage3-economic man) (26 Feb 10 baggage4- Descartes) (1 Mar 10 baggage5-Locke)
-
But religious fundamentalists are not happy with recent developments. (12 Mar 09 Fundamentalists will challenge) (2 Apr 09 No conflict with science)
Some ‘how’ hypotheses
There are some hypotheses that seem very convincing. So far we have taken a quick look at the following:
-
Bayesian calculations create consciousness. (2 Jun 08 is the brain bayesian) (24 Dec 08 Friston’s law ) looked at the possibility put forward by K Friston.
-
R Rensink has a hypothesis that there are two aspects of consciousness, the big picture without detail and the focus with a few items in detail. (29 Jul 08 change)
-
R Llinas puts forward a hypothesis that the thalamus controls consciousness (6 Dec 08 yet more Llinas)
-
The Gaillard group and others are finding the neural correlates of consciousness. (21 Mar 09 Neural correlates of consciousness) (24 Mar 09 The global workspace) (27 Mar 09 The P3 wave) (property of consciousness 2)
-
Firth has a well developed theory (1 Jun 09 what is easy and what is hard) (4 Jun 09 feeling separate from the world) (7 Jun 09 feeling separate from others) (10 Jun 09 Bayesian perception) (13 Jun 09 error signals)
-
It is always a good idea (if you can do it) to understand something by reinventing it. (19 Feb 09 On the way to artificial consciousness)
-
Chalmers’ epiphenomenalism is not convincing. (1 Jul 09 Emerging understanding) (4 Jul 09 Chalmers and emergence) (7 Jul 09 Chalmers and epiphenomenalism) (11 Oct 09 hard-problem mindset)
-
Tononi and panpsychic theory. (10 Jul 09 a panpsychic theory of consciousness) (2 Sep 09 search methods)
-
Morsella (8 Oct 09 resolving conflicting intentions) (1 Nov 09 Morsella 1) (4 Nov 09 Morsella 2)
-
Fuster theory of cognit networks (31 Dec 09 Fuster’s theory of cognits) (3 Jan 10 more Fuster theory)
-
Crick’s dying paper (19 Mar 10 the chaustrum)
-
My own hypothesis for many years has been massively parallel overlapping feed back loops within the cortex and between the cortex and the thalamus. (4 Jul 08 ambiguous perceptions) (14 Sep 08 feedback) (25 Feb 09 A different kind of computing) (28 Feb 09 Analog computers) (3 Mar 09 A big network) (26 Apr 09 My own tentative view)
Methods and instrumentation concerns
(19 Jul 09 EEG questions) (5 Sep 09 fMRI scans astorcytes) (2 Oct 09 dead fish and voodoo) (14 Oct 09 effects of brain waves) (2 Feb 10 a decade of neuroscience) (25 Mar 10 materialism) (18 May 10 discounting science)
Miscellaneous bits and pieces
(23 Jul smell is different), (30 Aug 08 do grandmother cells fly?), (12 Oct 08 metaphor to embodiment), (27 Nov 08 not inside us), (11 Jan 09 Epistemology changes), (20 Jan 09 Proprioception), (16 Feb 09 Other definitions) (20 Apr 09 A kluge?) (8 May 09 Top down processing) (25 Jun 09 consciousness takes a lot of energy) (31 Jul 09 revisiting grandmother cells) (3 Aug 09 reading brain patterns) (30 Aug 09 innate categories) (11 Sep 09 wisdom) (23 Oct 09 fruits of introspection) (19 Nov 09 astrocytes) (22 Nov 09 a radio metaphor) (2 Dec 09 where are the concepts?) (19 Dec 09 the missing hierarchical level) (22 Dec 09 working in the missing hierarchical level) (9 Jan 10 the content of consciousness) (18 Jan 10 the big C) (25 Mar 10 a possible reason for consciousness) (27 Apr 10 the connection is important)
Posted in summary | 1 Comment »
Mirror neurons in autism
21/05/2010 by admin.
A ScienceDaily item (here) reports the work of I. Dinstein on mirror neurons. It seems that they may not be magical mindreaders after all.
A team of neuroscientists has found that the mirror neuron system, which is thought to play a central role in social communications, responds normally in individuals with autism. Their findings, reported in the journal Neuron, counter theories suggesting that a mirror system dysfunction causes the social difficulties exhibited by individuals with autism…
For the simulation process to work properly, it is imperative that we simulate the exact same movement we are observing. This means that neurons within our mirror system must recognize movements and respond with a unique, movement-selective, response to each (or else we’ll confuse different movements and attribute improper goals to the person we’re observing)…
Because individuals with autism have difficulty communicating socially and understanding the emotions and intentions of others, it has been hypothesized that they may have a dysfunction in their mirror neuron system. This hypothesis has received a tremendous amount of attention in both the popular and scientific literatures following a number of studies that reported weak mirror neuron system responses in individuals with autism. …
These results, they conclude, argue strongly against the “dysfunctional mirror system hypothesis of autism” because they show that mirror system areas respond normally in individuals with autism. The authors, therefore, suggest that it may be more productive to re-focus autism research in more promising directions.
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »
Discounting science
18/05/2010 by admin.
Here is an interesting observation from the Journal of Applied Social Psychology, The Scientific Impotence Excuse by G. Munro. I would give the link but it no longer works for me and so I don’t feel comfortable giving it as a hyperlink.
The scientific impotence discounting hypothesis predicts that people resist belief-disconfirming scientific evidence by concluding that the topic of study is not amenable to scientific investigation. In 2 studies, participants read a series of brief abstracts that either confirmed or disconfirmed their existing beliefs about a stereotype associated with homosexuality. Relative to those reading belief-confirming evidence, participants reading belief-disconfirming evidence indicated more belief that the topic could not be studied scientifically and more belief that a series of other unrelated topics could not be studied scientifically. Thus, being presented with belief-disconfirming scientific evidence may lead to an erosion of belief in the efficacy of scientific methods.
This may explain the number of people who profess to wanting the nature of consciousness clarified but who do not believe that neuroscience is a method for getting understanding.
When there is no real evidence, theories can ‘free wheel’. A theory can become elaborate and generally accepted with negligible evidence; some devote their lives to teaching and improving the theory. Then some evidence comes along that does not fit with the theory. Small amounts of counter evidence may be ignored but when it comes thick and fast, many seem to close their minds, not just to individual pieces of evidence but to the whole idea that there is or should be evidence.
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »
Milestone
17/05/2010 by admin.
This blog has just passed the 100,000 visits mark today. That total is very pleasing for 2 years of existence. Thank you for your visits.
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »
Embodied power
15/05/2010 by admin.
Simoleon Sense has a post with a link to an interesting paper (here), Power Posing: Brief Nonverbal Displays Affect Neuroendocrine Levels and Risk Tolerance , by D. Carney.
In research on embodied cognition, some evidence suggests bodily movements, such as facial displays, can affect emotional states. For example, unobtrusive contraction of the “smile muscle” (i.e., the zygomaticus major) increases enjoyment (Strack, Martin, Stepper, 1988); the head tilting upwards induces pride (Stepper & Strack, 1993); and hunched (vs. upright) physical postures elicit more depressed feelings (Riskind & Gotay, 1982). Approach-oriented behaviors, such as touching, pulling, or nodding “yes,” increase preference for objects, people, and persuasive messages (e.g., Briñol & Petty, 2003; Chen & Bargh, 1999; Wegner, Lane, & Dimitri, 1994); and fist clenching increases men’s self-ratings on power-related traits (Schubert & Koole, 2009). However, no research has tested whether expansive versus constrictive power poses cause mental, physiological, and behavioral change in a manner consistent with the effects of power. Specifically, we hypothesized that high- versus low-power poses would cause individuals to experience: (1) elevated testosterone, (2) decreased cortisol, (3) increased feelings of power, and (4) higher risk-tolerance. Such findings would suggest that embodiment goes beyond cognition and emotion and could have immediate and actionable impacts on behavior. ..
Results show that posing in high-power (versus low-power) displays causes physiological, psychological, and behavioral changes consistent with the literature on the effects of power on power-holders – elevation of the dominance hormone testosterone, reduction of the stress hormone cortisol, and increases in behaviorally demonstrated risk-tolerance and feelings of power.
These findings advance our understanding of embodied cognition in two important ways. First, they suggest that the effects of embodiment extend beyond emotion and cognition, to physiology and subsequent behavioral choice. For example, as described above, nodding one’s head “yes” leads to more persuasion, and smiling increases humor responses; we suggest that these simple behaviors, a head-nod or a smile, might also cause physiological changes that activate an entire trajectory of psychological, physiological, and behavioral shifts—essentially altering the course of that person’s day. Second, these results suggest that any psychological construct, such as power, with a signature pattern of nonverbal correlates may be embodied.
The idea that we have, first, a conscious feeling of power, then take a powerful pose is not shown in experiment. Instead we have, first, the unconscious signal to take a powerful pose, then the conscious feeling of power. Embodiment appears to be attitude-bodily response-conscious feeling, in that order.
Posted in fringe | 1 Comment »
Method acting
12/05/2010 by admin.
Yet again an observation from the Seed article - Genevieve Wanucha’s “Emotion’s Alchemy”. (here)
Psychologist Paul Ekman found that voluntary smiles and grimaces produce changes in the autonomic nervous system. His study participants actually began to feel happy or sad or angry after following instructions to set their facial muscles in certain positions. “Psychologically unmotivated and ‘acted’ emotional expressions have the power to cause feeling,” Damasio writes. Enter the actress.
Sheila Donio first attempted to cry onstage as the character “Rizzo” in a stage production of Grease in 2001. She has acted since childhood and settled into professional acting career as a teenager in São Paulo, Brazil. “As I knew I wanted to cry on a specific scene,” she explained, “I started to work on Rizzo’s emotions at home, listening to the song used right before my crying scene. Studying Rizzo’s emotions with that specific soundtrack made my brain connect one thing with the other.” Method acting, techniques devised in the 1930s by Constantin Stanislavski, and later adapted by director Lee Strasberg, emphasize this use of sense memory. Students of this method learn to use personal memories of sensory details to trigger authentic physiological reactions.
Teaching herself, Sheila used this process to tap into the pathways of her brain responsible for the generation of crying. Crying on command became second nature. “Every time I heard that song, I would start to feel her anxieties and frustrations and the buttons for crying would show up in my body, ready to be pressed.” In fact, Sheila’s method of manipulating her body’s physiology is a living demonstration of Damasio’s theory of emotion.
…. “I study how my body reacts when I am crying for real, in real life. It’s all about breathing, for me. I get myself on the highway that leads me to cry. When I do improv theatre, this is how I find my emotions in 30 seconds,” she said. As Sheila adjusts her inhalations and exhalations, her somatosensory cortex detects the body map for crying. Genuine sadness follows the tears. The tears amplify the feelings, triggering sharper emotion, creating a positive feedback loop. What Sheila describes as a “highway,” Damasio thinks of more as a two-way traffic rotary.
Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments »
Emotional feeling
09/05/2010 by admin.
Genevieve Wanucha wrote a very interesting article in Seed magazine, “Emotion’s Alchemy”. (here) Following on from the last post, more from this article.
…Damasio’s team found that people reported feeling emotional only after the eruption of a physical emotion. “It’s very important for you to think of emotion as an action, so crying is a component of emotion, never as a part of feeling. Feeling is a perception of the action we have,” he told me….
In that same study, Damasio found that the body-sensing region of the brain, the somatosensory cortex, came online as the feelings arose. Later, in 2006, he reported that for each basic emotion (e.g., happiness, sadness, anger, and fear) there is a distinct cardio-respiratory pattern. Linking these data sets together, in a technology-age tweaking of the James-Lange theory, Damasio suggests that feelings arise from “maps” continually forming in brain regions such as the somatosensory cortex. The brain doesn’t have simple “on” and “off “emotional switches. It is always in flux. Feelings are more than the brain’s perception of emotion; they are a constant process of mapping shifting body states.
What appears to be happening is that consciousness registers a perception of emotional states as a fringe feeling. Consciousness does not contain emotion – it contains a model of emotion existing in the body using the form of a feeling.
Posted in fringe | 1 Comment »
Control of emotion
06/05/2010 by admin.
Genevieve Wanucha wrote a very interesting article in Seed magazine, “Emotion’s Alchemy”. (here)
Parvizi’s PLC (pathological laughing and crying) research has led him to believe that emotions, instead of being consciously controlled, are spontaneous reactions that rely on an intact involuntary brain system to be appropriately projected into the world. This distinction has major implications for our belief in self-control. Through cognitive neuroscience’s history, it’s been assumed that the brain’s evolutionarily newer frontal lobe regulates the more primitive regions of emotion, desire, and instinct, “as if there are beasts living in the basement, and the tower controls those beasts,” Parvizi says. He calls this an outdated Victorian-era bias that insists our free will should be able to conquer instinct. In fact, the brain’s structures are more interdependent. And those beasts of emotion are much, much more complex.
He says that we certainly can consciously control our expressions… We have both voluntary and involuntary systems, but it seems like the brain uses autopilot settings much more than conscious direction. “It’s an old notion that we regulate our behavior through a very conscious process, through a hierarchical top down process,” he says. “My idea is that we respond automatically in a context and that automatism is built partly from our culture.” In other words, early childhood socialization and lifetime experiences, coded into memories, factor into our automatic emotional responses. For example, in Japan, where emotional suppression is valued, people tend to avoid overt emotional displays. Parvizi acknowledges that this is an area wide open for debate. It is not yet clear, for instance, if those cultural pre-sets are stored in the cerebellum, or sent there from other brain areas.
More from this article in future posts.
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »