<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Property of Consciousness 3</title>
	<link>http://charbonniers.org/2009/08/12/property-of-consciousness-3/</link>
	<description>A blog on consciousness by Janet Kwasniak</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 03:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: daedalus2u</title>
		<link>http://charbonniers.org/2009/08/12/property-of-consciousness-3/#comment-1396</link>
		<author>daedalus2u</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 15:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://charbonniers.org/2009/08/12/property-of-consciousness-3/#comment-1396</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It was an intersection I was familiar with (for 30 years), but not one I had used frequently, maybe a handful of times in the past few years.  There was extensive remodeling of that intersection which would have changed the location of any stop sign.  The intersection may have started out as a "yield" intersection when I first used it.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don't have a good visual memory for details like that, so I can't really remember that there is a stop sign there even now.  I know there is one, but not because I remember a visual image.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I saw the police lights the stop sign was no longer in my visual field of view.  I am sure that when I saw the lights I tried to figure out what was the cause and the image of the stop sign popped into my mind.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I see a movie, I can’t discuss it immediately.  It takes a while for it to become consolidated in memory in a way that I can access it, which is as a sequential series of events.  There is a great deal of detail that is available to me later after it consolidates that is not available to me immediately after seeing it.  I simply presume that many other aspects of life are the same way but they are not as apparent because the experience of a movie is something that can be easily shared (and so compared) in ways that other experiences in life cannot be.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In other words a lot of what I can eventually remember wasn’t in consciousness for a significant period of time.&lt;/p&gt;
JanetK: Very, very interesting. I hope that others, if they have had similar experiences, will put in a comment.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was an intersection I was familiar with (for 30 years), but not one I had used frequently, maybe a handful of times in the past few years.  There was extensive remodeling of that intersection which would have changed the location of any stop sign.  The intersection may have started out as a &#8220;yield&#8221; intersection when I first used it.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a good visual memory for details like that, so I can&#8217;t really remember that there is a stop sign there even now.  I know there is one, but not because I remember a visual image.  </p>
<p>When I saw the police lights the stop sign was no longer in my visual field of view.  I am sure that when I saw the lights I tried to figure out what was the cause and the image of the stop sign popped into my mind.  </p>
<p>When I see a movie, I can’t discuss it immediately.  It takes a while for it to become consolidated in memory in a way that I can access it, which is as a sequential series of events.  There is a great deal of detail that is available to me later after it consolidates that is not available to me immediately after seeing it.  I simply presume that many other aspects of life are the same way but they are not as apparent because the experience of a movie is something that can be easily shared (and so compared) in ways that other experiences in life cannot be.  </p>
<p>In other words a lot of what I can eventually remember wasn’t in consciousness for a significant period of time.</p>
<p>JanetK: Very, very interesting. I hope that others, if they have had similar experiences, will put in a comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daedalus2u</title>
		<link>http://charbonniers.org/2009/08/12/property-of-consciousness-3/#comment-1376</link>
		<author>daedalus2u</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://charbonniers.org/2009/08/12/property-of-consciousness-3/#comment-1376</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am not sure that I agree with this.  I had an experience a few months ago that I think contradicts it.  I was driving while talking with someone (about nitric oxide and autism) and went through a stop sign because I didn’t "see" it.  I did slow down and went through the intersection at a speed where if there had been a need to stop I could have.  When the police turned their lights on to flag me down, I did remember that the stop sign was there, that I had seen it, but that it didn’t register.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I admit that the image of the stop sign was only in my working memory for a short time, but it was there and had not registered in my consciousness until after I had been stopped.  I think I do remember things that have not registered in my consciousness, this happens to be a good recent example.&lt;/p&gt;
JanetK: Very interesting. I do not remember such an incidence myself nor can I remember someone else talking about one. That doesn't mean much, except that it would be fairly rare. So far I can think of only a few explanations.

One - it was as you thought, the sign was in your memory but not in your consciousness.

Two – you were familiar with the intersection and so, when reminded by the police lights that there was a stop sign, you imagined it accurately as if you had just seen it.

Three – on seeing the police light you tried to identify what you could have done wrong and this generated a fringe qualia of familiarity (like deja vu).

Four – you had the sign in your consciousness but not in your focus of attention, so when the question became suddenly important, your attention shifted to it. 

It would be interesting to know if the exact circumstances make any of these impossible.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure that I agree with this.  I had an experience a few months ago that I think contradicts it.  I was driving while talking with someone (about nitric oxide and autism) and went through a stop sign because I didn’t &#8220;see&#8221; it.  I did slow down and went through the intersection at a speed where if there had been a need to stop I could have.  When the police turned their lights on to flag me down, I did remember that the stop sign was there, that I had seen it, but that it didn’t register.  </p>
<p>I admit that the image of the stop sign was only in my working memory for a short time, but it was there and had not registered in my consciousness until after I had been stopped.  I think I do remember things that have not registered in my consciousness, this happens to be a good recent example.</p>
<p>JanetK: Very interesting. I do not remember such an incidence myself nor can I remember someone else talking about one. That doesn&#8217;t mean much, except that it would be fairly rare. So far I can think of only a few explanations.</p>
<p>One - it was as you thought, the sign was in your memory but not in your consciousness.</p>
<p>Two – you were familiar with the intersection and so, when reminded by the police lights that there was a stop sign, you imagined it accurately as if you had just seen it.</p>
<p>Three – on seeing the police light you tried to identify what you could have done wrong and this generated a fringe qualia of familiarity (like deja vu).</p>
<p>Four – you had the sign in your consciousness but not in your focus of attention, so when the question became suddenly important, your attention shifted to it. </p>
<p>It would be interesting to know if the exact circumstances make any of these impossible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

