Comments on: Property of Consciousness 1 http://charbonniers.org/2009/08/06/142/ A blog on consciousness by Janet Kwasniak Tue, 22 May 2012 03:56:57 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 By: mariana http://charbonniers.org/2009/08/06/142/#comment-1128 mariana Thu, 06 Aug 2009 08:55:07 +0000 http://charbonniers.org/2009/08/06/142/#comment-1128 <p>I like a lot your proposed genereal model of consciousness<br /> I do not think the error provides imput to the reward system, I think it inhibits the input of the reward system to enter it<br /> I think that the system whether it is matematically bayesian or another one might probably have a fuzzy logic<br /> part in it.<br /> Bye j</p> JanetK: I think the error signal is complicated and so is the reward system. Firth says that if the error is good (we get something we like but didn't expect) the dopamine goes up and if there is no error the dopamine stays the same and if there is a negative error (we expected something good and it didn't happen) the dopamine goes down. I like a lot your proposed genereal model of consciousness
I do not think the error provides imput to the reward system, I think it inhibits the input of the reward system to enter it
I think that the system whether it is matematically bayesian or another one might probably have a fuzzy logic
part in it.
Bye j

JanetK: I think the error signal is complicated and so is the reward system. Firth says that if the error is good (we get something we like but didn’t expect) the dopamine goes up and if there is no error the dopamine stays the same and if there is a negative error (we expected something good and it didn’t happen) the dopamine goes down.

]]>