<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anthropomorphism</title>
	<link>http://charbonniers.org/2009/06/19/anthropomorphism/</link>
	<description>A blog on consciousness by Janet Kwasniak</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 03:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Mariana</title>
		<link>http://charbonniers.org/2009/06/19/anthropomorphism/#comment-601</link>
		<author>Mariana</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 07:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://charbonniers.org/2009/06/19/anthropomorphism/#comment-601</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I guess that you are saying that this issues are very subjective, depend too much on who is evaluating the situation. That is true, but at the same time there are many disciplines that deal with highly subjective observations, nevertheless some reach proper conclusions with the use of appropriately designed evaluating methods.&lt;/p&gt;
Janet K: I agree with you Mariana that subjective observations are useful – extremely useful, but they are not experiments. This was supposed to be an objective experiment rather than a subjective observation and it did not have the controls that should have been part of it. They came to a result on the subject of whether a certain behaviour was similar in dogs and people by examining the dogs' behaviour but not the humans'. I was also saying that there are two biases that are dangerous: assuming that humans are more unique than they are and assuming that humans are less unique than they are. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess that you are saying that this issues are very subjective, depend too much on who is evaluating the situation. That is true, but at the same time there are many disciplines that deal with highly subjective observations, nevertheless some reach proper conclusions with the use of appropriately designed evaluating methods.</p>
<p>Janet K: I agree with you Mariana that subjective observations are useful – extremely useful, but they are not experiments. This was supposed to be an objective experiment rather than a subjective observation and it did not have the controls that should have been part of it. They came to a result on the subject of whether a certain behaviour was similar in dogs and people by examining the dogs&#8217; behaviour but not the humans&#8217;. I was also saying that there are two biases that are dangerous: assuming that humans are more unique than they are and assuming that humans are less unique than they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

