<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The problem of free-will</title>
	<link>http://charbonniers.org/2008/09/17/the-problem-of-free-will/</link>
	<description>A blog on consciousness by Janet Kwasniak</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 02:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: jofr</title>
		<link>http://charbonniers.org/2008/09/17/the-problem-of-free-will/#comment-627</link>
		<author>jofr</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://charbonniers.org/2008/09/17/the-problem-of-free-will/#comment-627</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, intentions are crucial if we want to understand &#60;a href="http://blog.cas-group.net/2009/06/the-ghost-in-the-machine/" rel="nofollow"&#62;the ghost in the machine&#60;/a&#62;. I always considered the question of the self (and the related question of self-consciousness) more fundamental as the question of free-will. How can 'we' have a free will if 'we' don't exist, if a unified 'self' is only an illusion?&lt;/p&gt;
JanetK: It is a bit of encouragement to me that you have read some of the older posts and commented on them. Thanks.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, intentions are crucial if we want to understand &lt;a href=&#8221;http://blog.cas-group.net/2009/06/the-ghost-in-the-machine/&#8221; rel=&#8221;nofollow&#8221;&gt;the ghost in the machine&lt;/a&gt;. I always considered the question of the self (and the related question of self-consciousness) more fundamental as the question of free-will. How can &#8216;we&#8217; have a free will if &#8216;we&#8217; don&#8217;t exist, if a unified &#8217;self&#8217; is only an illusion?</p>
<p>JanetK: It is a bit of encouragement to me that you have read some of the older posts and commented on them. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

